Skip to main content
Media Alert Press Media Alert Press Check a URL
Wednesday, November 11, 2026
Live
Retractions of old papers are on the rise: when should bad science be culled?Metascience should be a source of evidence, not a means of controlAuthor or just ‘acknowledged’? How women are not gaining full credit for researchWhat to do if you, or someone around you, might be having a heart attackA distress call, a flight tracker and the rush to explain a Learjet crash‘In Flanders Fields’: How a patriotic poem became an anti-war anthem
74,310 Ledger Records 59 added in the last hour1,753 in the last 24 hours
What is counted?

Counted at 10:33:34 UTC. These figures count ledger entries that have a record hash, the same entries as the total. The newest of them was added at 10:33:31 UTC on 2026-11-11. Entries are added in batches when MAP checks its feeds, so the figures vary through the day.

Healthcare

Retractions of old papers are on the rise: when should bad science be culled?

By Dyani Lewis Nature
Retractions of old papers are on the rise: when should bad science be culled?

Feed excerpt — reported by Nature

Nature, Published online: 11 November 2026; doi:10.1038/d41586-026-03624-9Decades-old papers are increasingly being pulled from the literature, bringing a host of challenges.

MAP records observable characteristics of the original article (publisher, author, date, references, framing cues). MAP does not verify the article’s claims or score it. Read the full original story at Nature →

Original Source

This article was syndicated from Nature. All rights remain with the original publisher.

Powered by CookieAdmin